Talk:Devon Corporation

Delete?
I propose that the page not be deleted. Reason being, it plays an important role in the games, allowing the player to recieve certain important items and revive fossils into Pokémon. It is the Hoenn equivilant to Silph Co.. I think it plays an important role in the games, and thus should not be deleted. By the way, yes I was the one who created the page, but this is not me taking offence, it's me really believing this is an important article. --ARSNL 20:54, 5 August 2006 (UTC)


 * Wikipedia isn't a game guide. This level of detail belongs on some game site, not in Wikipedia.  --John Nagle 22:12, 5 August 2006 (UTC)


 * Nevertheless, the information is useful to those that would view the page on a regular basis. And besides, the Anime info would not be on any game website. Also, don't forget, this page talks about the fictional company, not the building itself. It it were a page on just the building itself, then I would agree with you. ARSNL 01:21, 6 August 2006 (UTC)


 * The Devon Corp. plays a major role in both the game and the anime. It is used in both of them to introduce the main antagonists in the storyline.  It also produces all of the items necessary for the trainers in both the game and the anime to take the long journeys they take on foot.  It also produces the Pokénav and gives it to the trainers in both of them, therefore they have a map and are able to complete the journey.  Also, in the game, without the Devon Corp's ability to revive fossils the player would not be able to complete the Pokédex, and therefore, the game.  The Devon Corp. may not be at the forefront of the game or the anime, but it is a major plot device in both of them.--Hybrid 08:15, 6 August 2006 (UTC)


 * How sad! Peter Shearan 13:57, 6 August 2006 (UTC)


 * Please, Shearan, that's not contributing to the discussion. Do you even follow Pokémon? If not, how can you commment? --ARSNL 14:11, 6 August 2006 (UTC)

Please people. Remember, this isn't about me being nerd or who does or doesn't follow Pokémon. This is about whether or not this article belongs on Wikipedia. ARSNL and I have stated our point of view and are waiting for someone else to state a view against us. I believe that ARSNL and I provided enough proof that Devon plays a big enough role to have its own article. Unless anyone can provide proof to the contrary or show that it deserves to be deleted for another reason then the article must stay. Please, keep all comments on subject. We aren't here to make enemies. Hybrid 16:47, 6 August 2006 (UTC)