Talk:Dhaam Dhoom/GA2

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: –– Jezhotwells (talk) 01:34, 5 April 2010 (UTC)

I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.

Checking against GA criteria

 * GA review (see here for criteria)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * This article is very poorly written and does not approach the criteria of "reasonably well written."
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * I have fixed some disambiguations, please check that the correct targets have been chose, especially Moscow Airport (there are five possibilities}
 * I have fixed some and tagged three dead links using WP:CHECKLINKS
 * Behindwoods is not a reliable source.
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * The article seems rather underdeveloped, with cursory details of production and release. Suggest that you study WP:WikiProject Films/Style guidelines
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Very poorly written, a long way away from GA standard. The issues raised at the last GA review have not been addressed. Suggest that you study the good article criteria before submitting again. Fail GA nomination. –– Jezhotwells (talk) 02:01, 5 April 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Very poorly written, a long way away from GA standard. The issues raised at the last GA review have not been addressed. Suggest that you study the good article criteria before submitting again. Fail GA nomination. –– Jezhotwells (talk) 02:01, 5 April 2010 (UTC)