Talk:DiDa Ritz/GA2

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Nominator: 15:43, 23 December 2023 (UTC)

Reviewer: Averageuntitleduser (talk · contribs) 12:26, 31 March 2024 (UTC)

One can never review to many drag queen GANs, excited to work with you again! Averageuntitleduser (talk) 12:26, 31 March 2024 (UTC)


 * Ditto! --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 14:29, 31 March 2024 (UTC)

Well-written
Did a bit of copy-editing, and here's what I'm left with:
 * She also joined thousands for the Drag March for Change — for clarity, perhaps: "She also joined the thousands participating in the Drag March for Change"
 * ✅ --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 23:58, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Link "The Princess"
 * ✅ --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 23:58, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
 * high points of the season — perhaps: "her high points within the season", to relate this more directly to her
 * ✅ --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 23:58, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
 * She is a member of the House of Hall — in this sentence, perhaps more emphasis on the House of Hall being an in-show lineage? Because someone might perceive it along the lines of a charitable organization.
 * ✅ I assume the House extends beyond the show, so instead of making it show-specific, I've clarified that House of Hall is a drag family. --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 23:58, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
 * I like that. Averageuntitleduser (talk) 00:20, 1 April 2024 (UTC)

Verifiable with no original research
Essentially all sources are reliable. As a student publication, The Columbia Chronicle and Indiana Daily Student are fine for events in their community (their uses are also uncontroversial), the ''Yahoo! Life article isn't syndicated, and Pride.com and Screen Rant'', which are mildly reliable, are primarily used for attributed opinion. No issues with close paraphrasing during my spot-check. The Screen Rant quote brings the Earwig score to 43% (27% in second place), but I believe its use is justified, it would be hard to express their sheer positivity another way. For the record, I paraphrased one part of The Columbia Chronicle quote.
 * Thanks! --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 00:00, 1 April 2024 (UTC)

Spot-check

 * Looks good
 * Looks good
 * Looks good
 * Bottom two is a reasonable assumption, looks good
 * Looks good
 * Looks good
 * Looks good
 * Bottom two is a reasonable assumption, looks good
 * Looks good
 * Looks good
 * Looks good
 * Looks good
 * Looks good
 * Looks good

Broad in its coverage
I've done a whole lot of looking for sources. Ritz seems on the more popular end of drag queens, considering how many mentions she has received over the years about her lip-sync. But, I think the article does a great job of balancing this with the other aspects of her time on Drag Race, and her other activities in general; there are some really great finds. The most detailed unused sources are drama ones, which... yeah no.
 * Thanks! --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 00:00, 1 April 2024 (UTC)

Neutral
Neutral as can be.
 * --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 00:00, 1 April 2024 (UTC)

Stable
No recent content disputes or edit wars.
 * --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 00:01, 1 April 2024 (UTC)

Illustrated
The two Flickr images are informative and correctly labeled as Creative Commons.
 * --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 00:01, 1 April 2024 (UTC)

Summary
I don't think I'll ever stop being enamored by these; great work and happy Easter! Averageuntitleduser (talk) 20:09, 31 March 2024 (UTC)


 * @Averageuntitleduser Much appreciated! --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 00:01, 1 April 2024 (UTC)


 * I like the fixes; I am now happy to promote this article! Averageuntitleduser (talk) 00:21, 1 April 2024 (UTC)