Talk:Diadematidae

HI - a basic table listing biological taxonomy isn't real useful - could you try to make it more of an article and not jsut a data sheet? I've noticed this comment getting made on some of the other pages you have created as well. Regards Manning 02:14, July 21, 2005 (UTC)

Thank you for your suggestion. Of course that I don't agree with your stattement that a table listing biological taxa is no useful. You can pick informations among several books and all of them have taxonomical lists about the described species.Is a very usefull way to understand the taxonomical position of each species. Realy worst is the fact that one can't have a complete taxa description about a specific group withouth having to read several authors and compare them, for finaly conclude in which direction to go. All I'm presenting is a simple way to have species taxonomy in a simple and comprehensive way. This is complete diferent from Wikipedia Tree of Life and of course can be linked to that project, assuming that you can find in W. Tree of Life no more than a few species.As for the description I assume that W. Tree of Life is the correct place for explain each species. You can also see another list of taxonomical clasifications in Shark taxonomy specialy in Shark taxonomy Order Hexanchiformes and so far I didn't received any indication of no useful lists.If you saw some of that information, please let me know because as I've not seen I would like to answer.Tank you--JPPINTO 00:45, 23 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Hello Manning