Talk:Dialectical phenomenology

redirect not supported by target
This redirect is not supported by the sources cited at the target. Also, although it's not wrong, it's not a standard way of describing Hegel's project. I'm removing the text from the phenomenology (philosophy) article.

It is, however, a plausible search term. I just don't think that it's been effectively trademarked (so to speak) by any single figure or distinctive phenomenological approach ("dialectic" is just such an elastic term).

@Omnipaedista, do you have an idea for what to do with this redirect? Or do you have a source for the article?

Thanks! Patrick (talk) 15:21, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
 * When I created the redirect, there was still a citation I had inserted supporting the claim . Then the citation was removed. --Omnipaedista (talk) 15:33, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Certainly I did not mean to suggest that you would have added it without reason!
 * I don't have access to that book, but its Amazon product description indicates that it is an argument for a Grundrisse-inflected reading of Marx as a "dialectical phenomenologist". Using the term to describe Hegel, I'm guessing, is probably is not a great representation of the author's position. Patrick (talk) 15:58, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
 * It is a term that has been used to describe Hegel's work but it is not a mainstream description of it. We could redirect this redirect page to Hegel or even nominate it for deletion. I am not currently active on Wikipedia to be involved in further actions, I am afraid. --Omnipaedista (talk) 16:03, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Agree with first sentence. I just wanted to check in with you before taking further action since you created the redirect. Thanks for all the work you've done on Wikipedia! Cheers, Patrick (talk) 16:11, 4 May 2024 (UTC)