Talk:Dialogue-Assisted Visual Environment for Geoinformation

I think the references given are sufficient to support N, so I have removed the tag. DGG 04:13, 29 March 2007 (UTC)


 * I don't understand, there is nothing notable in the references, one does not even appear to mention the project. Unless you can provide some indication of notability I will nominate this for deletion. Rich257 12:47, 29 March 2007 (UTC)


 * You're wrong. Thankfully I got PDFs for all three of the cited works from Google. I didn't have to read past the abstracts to see phrases like "our software" which smacks of WP:COI coming from the development team at Penn State. Thus, the given references made the subject verifiable but not notable. Notability demands that sources be independent of anyone who worked/is working on the project. It failed WP:SOFTWARE before I found some mentions in ACM News, and another magazine that appears to track government ventures into new technologies. These are the types of sources that satisfy notability, not the papers from the development team. (A side effect of rewriting from "outside" sources is that the significance of the topic to the general reader is asserted.) Resurgent insurgent 16:02, 29 March 2007 (UTC)

Rated article
I agree with the bots that this article is a stub (since it's very short and under-referenced, and most of the references are old and, judging by the previous section, somewhat COI-y). As for importance, I'm rating it as Low-importance since I don't really see how this is very important to the world of software. Please review; thanks. Duckmather (talk) 16:47, 10 May 2021 (UTC)