Talk:Dialogue on Translation Between a Lord and a Clerk

I wonder who decides "notability"? Wikipedia cheerfully hosts articles about film and pop stars of whom I have never heard and in whom I am not interested, yet raises questions about matters that are of scholarly interest. Personally I was most interested in discovering information on this "Dialogue" and just wish the article was longer and had more information - though it probably contains all that can be usefully said without reproducing the "Dialogue" in full.

I note, for example, that there is a lengthy article on Kim Kardashian, a talentless but beautiful (at least, when she has her make-up on) television personality whose main achievement appears to have been a fake marriage to some other nonentity. No one wants to delete that article - and I would not wish to see it deleted, even though to my mind it is totally lacking in "notability".

By all means let the editors of Wikipedia concern themselves with accuracy, but unless they wish to claim omniscience, stop deleting articles just because they are of no interest to those editors. *Every* article is of interest to someone and a contribution to the world of knowledge, whether it is about some minor star, minor insect or minor work of literature. KendallKDown (talk) 10:34, 21 June 2012 (UTC)

Notable
I don't have time to populate the article with sources but notability is not in question see Google Books. I've removed the tag. If you believe otherwise than I request an AfD to settle the matter, and not restore the tag. -- Green  C  23:11, 17 March 2015 (UTC)