Talk:Diana DiZoglio

Non-Neutral POV
This article, as structured, reads like a promotional piece. The language should be adjusted to reflect a NPOV. After further reading, many of the links cited from whav dot net appear to be press releases from a campaign or governmental office published without edit. These are considered impartial by Wikipedia standards and should be removed or verified with other sources. Pbruce1110 (talk) 19:58, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
 * On a second read-though, at least one article cited was written by the subject of the article as self-promotion. Those links and the sections they were attached to have been removed as they are not independent reliable sources. Pbruce1110 (talk) 20:12, 9 August 2017 (UTC)

Cusack Scandal
This information seems relevant to me, and accurately depicts the information in the sources. I don't see why it shouldn't be in the article. If you disagree, please explain. ubiquity (talk) 18:45, 28 August 2014 (UTC)


 * Yes, agreed. It's public information, and since this is a biography of a living person and *not* a candidate endorsement page, the information should be and will be included. Pbruce1110 (talk) 16:28, 9 August 2017 (UTC)