Talk:Dick Bush

Not to be confused with...
You really did him dirty there PhearOfTheDark (talk) 19:26, 4 April 2024 (UTC)

Dick Bush vs Pubic Hair
Going to have to disagree with @Oktayey on this one-- while yes, it is somewhat humorous, it doesn't particularly tarnish the page of someone named "Dick Bush". Furthermore, "bush" is a relatively common term for pubic hair, but as far as I can tell there are no redirects in place for it-- this means it's entirely probable that someone who had only ever heard of it referred to as "bush" could end up on this article-- the distinction could be genuinely helpful. In all other cases, the distinction doesn't detract from anything in particular; funny, perhaps, but it falls well in line with Humor even if it were purely for humorous purposes (which again, it is not-- it serves a genuine purpose, however rare the possibility may be). Oman395 (talk) 02:16, 5 April 2024 (UTC)


 * Agree. Redirect should be restored. Peter L Griffin (talk) 04:18, 5 April 2024 (UTC)


 * I am reminded of Dick's cock. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 09:51, 5 April 2024 (UTC)


 * There is absolutely no chance that someone could land on this page while looking for "pubic hair". The hatnote is mildly amusing but basically pointless. Zacwill (talk) 21:24, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
 * @Zacwill I'd argue again that it is entirely possible for a user to land here while looking for public hair. There are a large number of places without proper sexual education; as a result, people may have only ever heard the term bush (perhaps in a pornographic or otherwise sexual context, as that's where it's usually found, being a somewhat informal term). This is purely anecdotal, but I've tended to hear "bush" more often when referring to female anatomy; as a result, a search for "Dick Bush" could easily be generated by a user who:
 * a. Does not know the proper term, and has only ever heard bush
 * b. Has not heard of it used in a male context, and therefore is looking for the male equivalent.
 * It's also worth noting that a user who would search "bush" would also be more likely to use an informal term like "dick", as opposed to "penis" or "male".
 * Again, while this is very much an uncommon occurrence, it's entirely possible for it to still happen-- think about it: we stand to lose nothing from its inclusion, but have the possibility of genuinely helping someone. Wouldn't you take that option? Oman395 (talk) 02:35, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
 * No. Zacwill (talk) 03:16, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Not to mention, Dick Bush, the man, is not well known either. If here were an A-tier celebrity, its likely that most of the traffic here would be for him. Since he's not, I suspect it's probable that a high-ish percentage of the low traffic that does come to this page could be looking for pubic hair. Peter L Griffin (talk) 06:19, 6 April 2024 (UTC)