Talk:Dick Turpin/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Pyrotec (talk) 16:10, 22 November 2009 (UTC)


 * Starting review. Pyrotec (talk) 16:10, 22 November 2009 (UTC)

Inital comments

 * Another WP:FAC in the offing? I'll give it a thorough check out first before awarding GA-status. :-) Pyrotec (talk) 16:59, 22 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Sorry for the delay in adding some proper comments. I was reviewing four out of ten educational assignment GANs; and nasty case, infectious, of "copyvios" errupted. This review is now top of my list for tomorrow. Pyrotec (talk) 22:59, 24 November 2009 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria


 * 1) Is it reasonably well written?
 * A. Prose quality:
 * B. MoS compliance:
 * 1) Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
 * A. References to sources:
 * B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
 * C. No original research:
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. Major aspects:
 * B. Focused:
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * Pass or Fail:

Congratulations on the quality of the article. I'm awarding GA-status. Pyrotec (talk) 17:36, 25 November 2009 (UTC)