Talk:Dickinson Dees

The [Dickinson Dees] wiki lacks references
So many of the comments are unsubstantiated. The page reads like an advertisement, which isn't really the purpose of Wiki. The history section, especially in relation to previous versions of the firm is anecdotal and, dare I say, irrelevant. The achievements of the firm is better, but somewhat haphazard and isn't balanced (it hasn't all been plain sailing). Maybe they could look at how other firms have written their pages? — Preceding unsigned comment added by BeadyEyedRaven (talk • contribs) 07:14, 9 August 2012 (UTC)

Does it really need recruitment links?
The article seems a bit of an advertisement in some sections, especially the section with links to their recruitment pages. Lantrix :: Talk :: Contrib :: 07:36, 27 August 2009 (UTC)

Legal Press report firm may have changed its own Wikipedia entry
The wiki entry has now been amended to reflect that the firm no longer exists. Prior to this, Roll on Friday, a leading legal publication, reported that the firm may have changed its own wikipedia entry to hide that the firm came last in a survey of staff at UK law firms.

This page lacks integrity and needs regular reviews from an independent source
The Dickinson Dees page does not give an independent account of the law firm. Many of the comments are aspirational rather than accurate. For example a quick check reveals the firm is not "top 50" in the UK. In addition, they have not won awards for several years and have made many redudancies in the last few years. This page needs to be regularly reviewed to stop it becoming a marketing tool. Lantrix :: Talk :: Contrib :: 09:32 (EFurs)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by ErmineFurs (talk • contribs) 09:34, 15 January 2011 (UTC)