Talk:Did It Again (Shakira song)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Calvin999 (talk · contribs) 19:08, 26 June 2013 (UTC)


 * Thank you for taking up the review! --WonderBoy1998 (talk) 02:47, 27 June 2013 (UTC)

One dead link
 * General
 * ✅ --WonderBoy1998 (talk) 12:41, 15 July 2013 (UTC)


 * Info box
 * Why is recorded 2008 and 2009?
 * ✅ --WonderBoy1998 (talk) 12:41, 15 July 2013 (UTC)


 * This is an English language single, so Dexter doesn't need to be here.
 * ✅ --WonderBoy1998 (talk) 12:41, 15 July 2013 (UTC)


 * As it is a dance song with elements of electropop and samba, electropop and samba should be removed.
 * ✅ --WonderBoy1998 (talk) 12:41, 15 July 2013 (UTC)


 * Lead
 * is a song by recorded by → Spot the mistake
 * ✅ --WonderBoy1998 (talk) 12:41, 15 July 2013 (UTC)


 * Is Shakira credited in the booklet as a co-producer? As The Neptune's rarely allow co-production.
 * I don't have the booklet, but many sites state Shakira as the producer of the song too. Shakira wrote and co-produced all the tracks on the album. --WonderBoy1998 (talk) 12:41, 15 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Okay. —  AARON  &bull; TALK


 * Use a different word than "lauded"
 * ✅ --WonderBoy1998 (talk) 12:41, 15 July 2013 (UTC)


 * Put US before Billboard
 * ✅ --WonderBoy1998 (talk) 12:41, 15 July 2013 (UTC)


 * Should write 'chart' after the name of the chart
 * ✅ --WonderBoy1998 (talk) 12:41, 15 July 2013 (UTC)


 * Background and composition
 * from the album She Wolf → Comma after album
 * ✅ --WonderBoy1998 (talk) 12:41, 15 July 2013 (UTC)


 * contains strong elements → Remove 'strong', it's superfluous in this context
 * ✅ --WonderBoy1998 (talk) 12:41, 15 July 2013 (UTC)


 * Critical reception
 * received very → Remove 'very', sounds bias
 * ✅ --WonderBoy1998 (talk) 12:41, 15 July 2013 (UTC)


 * Music video
 * I don't see the point of the one sentence block quote, just keep it as part of the prose.
 * ✅ --WonderBoy1998 (talk) 12:41, 15 July 2013 (UTC)


 * This section could simply be two paragraphs.
 * I made the section into three paras- Development, synopsis, and reception. Is that okay? Or shall I merge development and synopsis?--WonderBoy1998 (talk) 12:41, 15 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Yep —  AARON  &bull; TALK
 * ✅ --WonderBoy1998 (talk) 12:50, 15 July 2013 (UTC)


 * Live performances
 * She definitely performed this song on The X Factor in the UK.
 * ✅ --WonderBoy1998 (talk) 12:41, 15 July 2013 (UTC)


 * Charts
 * How come US Tropical isn't in the table if it peaked at 11?
 * It is there. --WonderBoy1998 (talk) 12:41, 15 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Okay. The Latin Airplay bit threw me. —  AARON  &bull; TALK


 * 2009 peaks should be in a separate table to 2010 peaks.
 * ✅ They were all 2009 peaks, I don't know why there was 10 there... --WonderBoy1998 (talk) 12:41, 15 July 2013 (UTC)


 * References
 * MTV, Digital Spy, Allmusic, BBC, UK Singles Chart, iTunes etc. should not be italics.
 * Ugh, I did this all in the beginning and some users used AWB and removed all the apostrophes. Well I'll do it again.
 * They should never be in italics, they aren't newspaper/printed applications. Whoever told you to make them italics was wrong. —  AARON  &bull; TALK
 * No I used the apostrophes to just cancel out the auto italicization of these entries. Anyways :✅ --WonderBoy1998 (talk) 12:50, 15 July 2013 (UTC)


 * It's Official Singles Chart, no 'The'

On hold —  AARON  &bull; TALK   20:39, 14 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Status
 * Passing. —  AARON  &bull; TALK   12:58, 15 July 2013 (UTC)