Talk:Didiereaceae

Image needs replacement
Hello all...

An image used in the article, specifically Image:Alluaudia procera.JPG, has a little bit of a licensing issue. The image was uploaded back when the rules around image uploading were less restrictive. It is presumed that the uploader was willing to license the picture under the GFDL license but was not clear in that regard. As such, the image, while not at risk of deletion, is likely not clearly licensed to allow for free use in any future use of this article. If anyone has an image that can replace this, or can go take one and upload it, it would be best.

You have your mission, take your camera and start clicking.--Jordan 1972 (talk) 01:23, 29 September 2008 (UTC)

Editing neded
"The family is sometimes included within the Portulacaceae, but is treated as distinct by the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group."

(There is a degree of confusion on this in Wikipedia articles: The above statement must be questioned. It is not clear whether Portulacaria is in this family as stated on the Portulacaceae page or whether this family is split off from Portulacaceae as a separate family as just stated. The key to genera below does not include Portulacaria so minimally this article needs editing by a specialist)

I shifted the above text from article space as it is more appropriate here than there. 122.109.129.154 (talk) 09:56, 8 December 2014 (UTC)