Talk:Didsbury Park

Is this article needed?
Why do we need a seperate article on a single park? Is it notable for any reason? Even if it is, why can the information not be included in the Didsbury article? J Milburn 18:49, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

It has been included on Didsbury page, and it is yes it a seperate page, because you can use this information and what's on Didsbury to colloborate and define it. (No it is not notable, it is a park!)

--Brylcreem2 19:13, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
 * There we go, not notable, should be deleted. Wikipedia has a policy that every article should be on a notable subject, as explained here, to prevent people writing about any old thing. Why should this one park have a whole article about it? There is no way there should be an article on my garden, the play-park down the road from me, the river in my back field, my back field, my street... I could go on. Of course, there is room for an article on my village, and all relevent information about the non-notable items within the village can be included there. J Milburn 19:17, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

Delete it then--Brylcreem2 19:22, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

Good for you....