Talk:Didymo in New Zealand

Adverse effects
What are the adverse effects of Didymo? Article doesn't say. --DThomsen8 (talk) 12:07, 3 April 2010 (UTC)

Strange statement
"an extensive public awareness campaign to encourage river users to clean their equipment after use in affected waterways. This campaign was highly successful, with up to a 90% decrease in use of affected rivers."

What is this supposed to mean. How is a 90% reduction in use of affected rivers a successful outcome for a campaign ? If 90% of fishers and boaters have now been discouraged from pursuing activities which they presumably previously enjoyed, then the loss of that enjoyment is a public dis-benefit and can hardly be characterised as highly successful.Eregli bob (talk) 13:57, 26 June 2010 (UTC)

It also lacks a reliable source. I have tagged it as 'needing a citation'. Alternatively you could be bold and delete it. Mrfebruary (talk) 06:09, 27 June 2010 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 1 one external link on Didymo in New Zealand. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100619131502/http://www.biosecurity.govt.nz:80/media/10-02-10/didymo-confirmed-in-waimakariri-river to http://www.biosecurity.govt.nz/media/10-02-10/didymo-confirmed-in-waimakariri-river

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 19:55, 12 December 2016 (UTC)