Talk:Die Hand Die Verletzt/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Ruby2010 (talk · contribs) 19:09, 20 January 2012 (UTC)

Will review this soon.  Ruby  2010/  2013  19:09, 20 January 2012 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:

Comments

 * Prelims
 * No dab or EL issues, the single image looks fine
 * There is a little recent instability; there appears to be a disagreement with an IP


 * Further issues
 * "The episode received positive reviews, praising the writing." This sentence doesn't quite make sense
 * Done. GRAPPLE   X  03:50, 21 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Change usage from Jim to Ausbury for consistency
 * Done. GRAPPLE   X  03:50, 21 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Added directing credits, guest stars to production section (everything in lead must be in main body of article); identify who Dan Butler is (who don't indicate he is a guest star in production section)
 * "...out of an idea from Glen Morgan's idea..." Idea...idea (redundant)
 * Done. GRAPPLE   X  03:50, 21 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Chris Carter -> Series creator Chris Carter
 * Done. GRAPPLE   X  03:50, 21 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Wikilink Glen Morgan and James Wong
 * Done. GRAPPLE   X  03:50, 21 January 2012 (UTC)
 * season four -> the fourth season (also add wikilink)
 * Done. GRAPPLE   X  03:50, 21 January 2012 (UTC)
 * "...were based on internet X-Files fans..." -> were based on fans from the Internet of The X-Files (or something similar)
 * Done. GRAPPLE   X  03:50, 21 January 2012 (UTC)
 * The episodes title -> The episode's title
 * Done. GRAPPLE   X  03:50, 21 January 2012 (UTC)
 * :While fake frogs were considered for the scene where they fall from the sky, the producers decided to change to real ones, dropped from a short distance, as, according to Carter, the "fake ones looked too bad and didn't hop away after command"" Should be split up into 2 sentences; or add a semicolon
 * Done. GRAPPLE   X  03:50, 21 January 2012 (UTC)
 * "Dan Butler was terrified of the animal, being unable to talk while shooting the scene in the basement, and the make-up team not needing to apply fake sweat on the actor.[7]" Sentence needs to be rewritten
 * Done. GRAPPLE   X  03:50, 21 January 2012 (UTC)
 * 10.2 million households or 10.7 million people? (compare lead and production section)
 * Done. GRAPPLE   X  03:50, 21 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Reception section: Series creator Chris Carter -> Chris Carter
 * Done. GRAPPLE   X  03:50, 21 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Use consistent accessdate formatting (compare ref 10 to 11)
 * Done. GRAPPLE   X  03:50, 21 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Use consistent date formatting (compare ref 9 to 11)
 * Done. GRAPPLE   X  03:50, 21 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Also: identify Wong and Morgan's relationship to the series (producers? just writers?)  Ruby  2010/  2013  04:16, 21 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Done. GRAPPLE   X  04:23, 21 January 2012 (UTC)

On hold for seven days while above get addressed. I'd also like to hear your thoughts on the IP issue. Thanks,  Ruby  2010/  2013  03:33, 21 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Got seeing to these when I saw the review go up. As the one who dealt with the IP, I think it's a one-off blip. I dropped a talk page note to them when it looked like it might go beyond 3RR, explaining the issue, and it hasn't occurred since. If you want to leave this a couple of days, or even the full holding week to be sure of it then that'd be understandable. It's probably what I would do. GRAPPLE   X  03:50, 21 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Your changes look good. Per your recommendation, I'll keep the review on hold for a few more days to ensure there is not instability from that particular IP (or anyone else). Thanks,  Ruby  2010/  2013  04:16, 21 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Seems fair. Best to play it safe. GRAPPLE   X  04:23, 21 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Looks to me like the IP activity has stopped.--Gen. Quon (talk) 18:03, 24 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Yep, stability looks good. Passing article. Nice work!  Ruby  2010/  2013  01:53, 25 January 2012 (UTC)