Talk:Dietary vegans

Contested deletion
This article should not be speedy deleted as lacking sufficient context to identify its subject, because... (I just started this article and I'm compiling research with medical links) --Timpicerilo (talk) 13:04, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
 * We already have Veganism, so I've nominated it for deletion as a duplicate of an article we already have. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 21:56, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Veganism is done mainly for the ethical treatment of animals in the article Veganism it refers to Dietary vegans with no explanation making the article Dietary vegans necessary or in the least be merged into the veganism article. Dietary vegans are typically not accepted as full vegans yet there's many notable aspects of Dietary vegans and the individuals that follow it.Timpicerilo (talk) 22:07, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
 * The Veganism article seems to cover dietary veganism to a pretty reasonable degree and so there's a massive overlap between the two articles. If there's anything missing about dietary aspects, then it's surely a lot less confusing to add it to Veganism rather than create two articles with lots of duplicate coverage - merge, as you suggest. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 22:20, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
 * You're right I will merge some of the important detail.Timpicerilo (talk) 22:28, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
 * OK, sounds good - I'll remove my deletion request, and after you've done the merge maybe this title could just be redirected to Veganism. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 22:32, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Thanks I'm done with merge but not sure how to fully delete I blanked the page in my attempt.Timpicerilo (talk) 22:35, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
 * I've redirected it - then if somebody uses "Dietary vegans" as a search term they'll find the merge target. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 22:52, 6 March 2016 (UTC)