Talk:Dig Dug: Digging Strike/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Abryn (talk · contribs) 16:06, 27 August 2019 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):  d (copyvio and plagiarism):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:


 * The gameplay image does not appear to have an actual source.
 * Fixed.
 * I can't really see if the source is accurate as I cannot read Japanese, but does it confirm that Bullets is known for their work on Hero Bank?
 * Yes. Under the section that says "2014" it lists both Hero Bank and Hero Bank 2. I found this out by simply using Google Translate. Namcokid47 (talk) 14:43, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
 * My question is though is if it says they are known for it. - Bryn (talk) (contributions) 15:07, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
 * They helped work on it, but saying they're "known" for it is a real stretch. Changed the sentences. Namcokid47 (talk) 15:34, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
 * I would recommend taking text that is a large quotation, such as with Nintendo World Report, and rewriting it to be a summation of what they said instead. In general I encourage that you get the sentiment across of what they said, like instead of quoting IGN saying ugly you might try something else.
 * Fixed. Namcokid47 (talk) 15:03, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Sources that it combines mechanics from Dig Dugs 1 and 2 should be used in the Gameplay section as well.
 * Done. I also went ahead and sourced the Gameplay section in general (something I strangely never did). Namcokid47 (talk) 15:03, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
 * All right, that should be everything then. Nice job with this article. - Bryn (talk) (contributions) 16:23, 28 August 2019 (UTC)