Talk:Digambara literature

Requested move 1 May 2020

 * The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 

The result of the move request was: Moved. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 10:54, 25 May 2020 (UTC)

Jain Agamas (Digambara) → Digambara literature – better title per wikipedia standards Capankajsmilyo(Talk 15:50, 1 May 2020 (UTC) —Relisted. – Ammarpad (talk) 10:23, 9 May 2020 (UTC)


 * The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The title Digambara literature is incorrect
The Digambara tradition has numerous other texts. Mahapurana, Ratnakranda Shravakachara, Dravya Sangrah and hundreds of other texts. The older title was Jain Agamas (Digambara) was better. In reality the books discussed here are not agamas, but books that regarded to be "agama-tulya".

Malaiya (talk) 02:03, 23 November 2020 (UTC)

Simandhar Swami is not "Living God"
Simandhar Swami is considered to a a living Tirthankara in Videha Kshetra. He is not [God] in the sense of the common usage of the word. There is no Abrahamic, creator God in Jainism.

Malaiya (talk) 02:11, 23 November 2020 (UTC)