Talk:Dimagi

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Dimagi. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130512162957/http://www.businessweek.com/smallbiz/content/jun2011/sb20110621_158462.htm to http://www.businessweek.com/smallbiz/content/jun2011/sb20110621_158462.htm/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 19:45, 10 September 2017 (UTC)

Requested Edit to Dimagi page

 * What I think should be changed: Hi there! I submitted four edit changes on December 3 to the page Dimagi (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Dimagi&action=history), all with the intent of updating the information on the page to more timely information. Per Wikipedia's updated Conflict of Interest Policy (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Conflict_of_interest#How_to_disclose_a_COI), I am employee at Dimagi (although not one hired to write content) and have stated my COI on my user profile (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:GJavetski).

I am writing to request if it would be possible for someone to review my four edits (prior to my final one where I reverted) with the username GJavetski on December 3, 2021 to see if it would be possible to edit the page. I have ensured that none of these are "selling" any products, all have external references, and all have the right attributions. Thank you.


 * Why it should be changed: To update the page to more up to date information.


 * References supporting the possible change (format using the "cite" button): All of the changes I made use the cite mechansim.

GJavetski (talk) 20:43, 3 December 2021 (UTC)


 * Hey I'm taking a look at the differences now, Ill reply when I'm done Signed, I Am Chaos (talk) 06:55, 5 December 2021 (UTC)


 * Hey I finished looking at your revisions and I just have the one question about the removal of a few items under the partnerships tag. Otherwise, you can see on the edit request tag above you are able to make those changes yourself. Like I said below, Ill take a look at those two items in the morning if you haven't responded yet. TAG: Pictogram voting keep.svg Go ahead: I have reviewed these proposed changes and suggest that you go ahead and make the proposed changes to the page. Signed, I Am Chaos (talk) 06:55, 5 December 2021 (UTC)


 * 14:07 UTC Revision. I support the change.
 * 14:09 UTC Revision. Accurate as per first page of source.
 * 14:15 Revision. The infobox seems fine, I would ask what the removal under "partnerships" was for, I'll take a look in the morning with fresh eyes though and see what that is when I can read the sources.
 * 15:06 Revision. It all seems good. I'm just gonna take your word on San Fancisco because I can't see it, but your source is still acceptable under WP:PAYWALL so don't worry about that because your other sources are good.


 * Forgot to tag you in my reply