Talk:Dimension Zero

Other band deleted
Since the other band was deleted (so hastefully that when I saw that it was going to be speedied that it was already a red link) would it be safe now to move this back to Dimension Zero or wait for any recreation? --CircafuciX (talk) 23:10, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
 * I speedy'd the other band page. I've made a request for this page to be moved back at Requested_moves. Funeral 23:34, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
 * I noticed but the author of the article may create it again (maybe this time with some insertion of notability) so I think we should wait a day or 2 for any response. By the way, that was the fastest speedy I've ever seen. --CircafuciX (talk) 23:43, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
 * I'm inclined to agree that not moving the article will minimize collateral damage. Dimension Zero redirects to here right now, so anybody looking for the band name alone will wind up here. Note also that this is the second round of article creation attempts for the US band; it had been a while since the first round (which I helped clean up, which is why the article was in my watch list). —C.Fred (talk) 00:15, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
 * I've moved this page back to distinguish the Swedish band from the US band and addressed the issues of notability on Dimension Zero (US Band). Dimensionzero (talk) 01:58, 14 December 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:DZLogo.png
Image:DZLogo.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

...

BetacommandBot (talk) 19:10, 22 December 2007 (UTC)


 * That was an amusing problem. The article was specified in the image's rationale, but when Dimension Zero got updated, the link wasn't changed in the Image rationale to point here. That's been fixed. —C.Fred (talk) 19:35, 22 December 2007 (UTC)