Talk:Dimorphodon

Reasons why the Flickr link is a decent source
1.The gallery belongs to the pterosaur researcher (Mark Witton) that, alongside Darren Naish, wrote the essay on azhdarchid paleoecology

2.The points given make sense (read the text for the info on the wing loading, claws and head size)

3.Dimorphodon, according to the article, was a descendent of Peteinosaurus, itself a terrestrial form; wouldn't it make more sense if Dimorphodon continued in that line?

I hope I cleared everything --Falconfly —Preceding undated comment was added at 13:46, 8 February 2009 (UTC).
 * Hi again, take a look at what I wrote on my talk page. Remember, we should directly cite the papers the research has been done in, not some other page which just refers to it, and point 3, that's pretty much what's called "original research" on Wikipedia. FunkMonk (talk) 14:06, 8 February 2009 (UTC)