Talk:Dinesh Karthik/GA2

GA Reassessment
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the reassessment.''

It seems like this article has a lot of problems from the article with the main immediate failures being in this article as their is a lot of issues compared to the one that was in 2008. There seems to be a lot of ciations needed in certain sections which is a reason to demoted this article because of it. So basically even without going through it fails these criteria: - Both sections of 1 - 2c - it contains no original research - And before it was fixed by, 3a and 3b but their is still problems to be fixed there too.

So I do believe that unless someone works on it for this week. it's probably going to be demoted. HawkAussie (talk) 08:23, 12 June 2019 (UTC)


 * There's no way I have a chance to work on it at all until August really. The whole international section needs gutting and re-writing in a summary style: I agree that as of now it's so far away from a good article that it's laughable. Blue Square Thing (talk) 09:36, 12 June 2019 (UTC)
 * It is laughable to say that a Good Article is this type of quality. So therefor, this page will be relegated to a C-rating. HawkAussie (talk) 09:51, 12 June 2019 (UTC)