Talk:Dingyuan-class ironclad/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk · contribs) 04:01, 26 December 2016 (UTC)

Will take this one. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 04:01, 26 December 2016 (UTC)


 * Section 1;
 * Naval conflicts with Western powers; could you get in some examples?
 * viceroy; I think "v" must be capital; and "viceroy" of what?
 * Section 1.1; Consistency maintained, all the parameters—Displacement, Length, Beam, Draft, Power, Propulsion, Speed, Armament and armor—seem fine. Conversion templates and link s in right place
 * Section 1.2;
 * 31.5-long-ton (32.0 t); be consistent, remove -
 * Link stern
 * barbettes; this is over linked
 * 3 inches (7.6 centimetres); abbreviate units
 * 8 inches (20 centimetres); abbreviate units
 * 3–0.5 inches (7.6–1.3 centimetres); abbreviate units
 * Section 3;
 * Link Captain
 * pre-assigned; it is single word, remove -
 * and began to sink, She was quickly; replace, with.
 * Remove section 6 as it is empty. Move the commons box to the last section.
 * Make sure that all the units in the infobox are abbreviated.
 * All good with dab and external links. 0% violation, good job.
 * Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 13:52, 3 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Thanks for reviewing, I've made those changes as suggested with the exception of the commons link, which I switched from the box template to an inline link. Miyagawa (talk) 20:09, 3 January 2017 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):  d (copyvio and plagiarism):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 14:22, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 14:22, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 14:22, 4 January 2017 (UTC)