Talk:Dino Time

Useless Sections
I firmly believe the "Storyline" section of this article should be eliminated on four accounts:
 * 1) It is nothing more than a more concise restatement of the previously-established "Plot" section.
 * 2) Its tone is comparable to that of an advertisement rather than a reference piece.
 * 3) No other article in Wikipedia about a film features any section titled "Storyline."
 * 4) It's quoted directly from IMDb, which has been an historically questionable citation for information here on Wikipedia.

I also believe the "Crew" section should be eliminated on two accounts:
 * 1) No other article in Wikipedia about a film features any section titled "Crew."
 * 2) The whole section is literally nothing more than one run-on sentence.

I request anyone's opinion as to why these sections should be kept, even if they are a major exception to the general format of Wikipedia articles about films.

Thank you for your time and consideration.

Kind regards,

~ Anonymous Anthony


 * The "Rumors & Disappointment" section is an incoherent mess. 87.92.204.68 (talk) 08:42, 4 May 2016 (UTC)

Proposed Change
COI Disclosure: I work for Aviron Pictures, which has been incorrectly referenced on Wikipedia as the same company as Clarius Entertainment, the distributor of Dino Time. As such, the Clarius Entertainment hyperlink on this page incorrectly redirects to the Aviron Pictures page. (Please note that the larger issue regarding divorcing the two companies on Wikipedia has already been requested via the Aviron Pictures Wikipedia page.) Dino Time has no affiliation with Aviron Pictures and should not link to the Aviron Pictures Wikipedia page. Thank you. Westlake8992 (talk) 20:48, 25 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Well, someone did say that they requested tech help on Clarius Entertainment page, but no changes in the situation seem to have taken place after that. Not much that an independent editor can do with re-linking to the correct page, since there isn't one. Request declined. Regards, VB00 (talk) 12:41, 1 January 2017 (UTC)

Link rot
To clarify what I did here some time ago, the official site URL now points to a full-page spread of pornography and I was unable to find a functional archived version of the original site. If anyone has a better alternative, please feel free to implement/let me know. Moonjail (talk) 19:21, 27 January 2021 (UTC)