Talk:Dinosaur Ridge

Requested move 15 September 2019

 * The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 

The result of the move request was: Consensus to not move as Colorado is the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC (non-admin closure) Cwmhiraeth (talk) 10:35, 2 October 2019 (UTC)

Dinosaur Ridge → Dinosaur Ridge (Colorado) – This is a reverted BOLD move with edit summary: "There are three articles with the name dinosaur ridge, so I plan to create a disambiguation." Taewangkorea (talk) 23:19, 15 September 2019 (UTC) --Relisting. &mdash; Amakuru (talk) 10:09, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
 * This is a contested technical request (permalink). --- Coffee  and crumbs  00:00, 16 September 2019 (UTC)


 * I queried the original request: Dinosaur Ridge (Alberta) is a painfully brief stub with no further contributions since it was created two years ago, while Dinosaur Ridge (Gangwon) is another short and also recently created article. I don't think its unreasonable to regard the Colorado formation as the primary topic, especially given its historical significance. Pageviews |Dinosaur_Ridge_(Gangwon)|Dinosaur_Ridge_(Alberta) since the start of August don't indicate much interest in the others, and winding the clock back further |Dinosaur_Ridge_(Alberta) to the start of 2017 doesn't paint a different picture. PC78 (talk) 00:13, 16 September 2019 (UTC)
 * There is a disambig page already at Dinosaur Ridge (disambiguation). Anthony Appleyard (talk) 03:07, 16 September 2019 (UTC)
 * ...created about 8 hours ago, yes. I believe the intention was to move that page to Dinosaur Ridge and disambiguate the Colorado one, which is the move I've contested. PC78 (talk) 07:55, 16 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Oppose per PC78. SnowFire (talk) 15:44, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Oppose per PC78 Taewangkorea (talk) 16:25, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Oppose per PC78. Station1 (talk) 19:27, 25 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Oppose per PC78. the clear primary topic for the name is Colorado, the other two should simply have a hat note, and the Gangwon quite possibly is better known in by the Chinese name and not the english translation.--- Kev  min  § 20:24, 25 September 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.