Talk:Dioscorea polystachya

Merger proposal
The first sentence of the article Dioscorea opposita as well as its "taxonomy" paragraph could maybe be left on that page to clarify the terminology. But the rest of the article is really concerned with Dioscorea polystachya and should probably be copied over. --KaiKemmann (talk) 02:08, 17 December 2015 (UTC)


 * Agree We do not have articles under scientific names that are no longer recognized or are incorrect. Peter coxhead (talk) 13:23, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Agree Use of Dioscorea opposita should be discouraged on this site. --MCEllis (talk) 23:40, 31 January 2016 (UTC)