Talk:Diplodocimorpha

Proposal of merge with Diplodocoidea
Diplodocoidea and Diplodocimorpha have nearly identical content, usually differing only in the inclusion of Haplocanthosaurus and sometimes not even that. There is pretty much no value in having separate pages for the two clades, and keeping them separate would be somewhat redundant and waste editors' time with two pages to maintain rather than one. Diplodocoidea is both the more inclusive clade and gets eight times as many hits on Google Scholar, so Diplodocimorpha should be merged into Diplodocoidea. Ornithopsis (talk) 14:20, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
 * I think I support this, provided its not just redirected, and the content is migrated over. The main superfamily article needs some work. IJReid { {T - C - D - R} } 15:22, 19 August 2022 (UTC)


 * Support, no need for two pages for a near-identical clade.  LittleLazyLass  (Talk | Contributions) 16:03, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Support, with the same caveat as IJ. Lythronaxargestes (talk &#124; contribs) 05:21, 22 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Support Per nom. Hemiauchenia (talk) 09:54, 23 August 2022 (UTC)