Talk:Dipuo Peters

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 1 one external link on Dipuo Peters. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120820131212/http://www.info.gov.za:80/gol/gcis_profile.jsp?id=1024 to http://www.info.gov.za/gol/gcis_profile.jsp?id=1024

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 15:45, 13 December 2016 (UTC)

Unsubstantiated information in article
Consider the section:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dipuo_Peters#Controversy_and_e-tolling_in_Gauteng

There are no citations for any of the statements in the paragraph and the statement "Dipuo Peters, in conjunction with other alleged beneficiaries of SANRAL's urban tolling project" in particular creates the impression that Dipuo Peters is the subject of allegations of some kind.

Dipuo Peters can not be a beneficiary of SANRAL's urban tolling project, unless there are allegations of corruption, of which there is no evidence provided. "Other" beneficiaries require clarification. "Alleged beneficiaries" requires clarification, as it implies "allegations of being a beneficiary", of which there is no evidence provided.

This statement: "Despite the financial burden already imposed on Gauteng residents due to significant electricity tariff hikes, load-shedding, the national fuel levy, and income tax hikes" appears to be editorial commentary by the writer. No citations have been provided, in particular relating to the connection between these financial burdens on the population and the statement "the minister has unveiled plans to classify the non-payment of toll levies as an AARTO infringement." The latter statement requires a citation. Also, Dipuo Peters is no longer the minister and should not be cited in a way that gives that impression. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Uhm, Actually (talk • contribs) 07:11, 3 September 2020 (UTC)