Talk:Direct Relief

Sources on Google
I googled this agency in responce to a google ad that appeared on www.eq2i.com, a wiki I work on. I was suspicious. A few minutes on Google soothed my suspicions. There were stories linked from Reuters and other news agencies regarding the work this charity is doing. I am NOT gonna do the reference/cite updates on this page, as it is not my area, but I suggest any interested editor just google the agency name and follow the links to the news reports. I AM going to remove the tag from the top. This article needs cites, it does not need deletion. --Bill W. Smith, Jr. (talk/contribs) 15:44, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
 * I did some citations; there's this thing going around that Forbes gave it 100% fundraising efficiency 5 years in a row, but all the sources I can find ultimately point back to the site itself. Can anyone verify this? Veinor (talk to me) 23:43, 20 February 2007 (UTC)

I see hulu commercials for this all the time. How much exactly do they spend on commercials? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.22.224.36 (talk) 17:12, 16 April 2009 (UTC)

Original source
Every citation in this article is originally sourced to Direct Relief International. I will add the template that asks for third-party sources. 71.234.215.133 (talk) 08:52, 13 November 2009 (UTC)

Copyright problem removed
Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.directrelief.org/about/history/. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and according to fair use may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Stesmo (talk) 23:46, 3 October 2014 (UTC)

Deletion of content
Information on Wikipedia is supposed to be backed with a citation to a source published by someone other than the subject of the article. In 2009 this article mostly has been unchanged and used only citations to the organization itself, which are considered on Wikipedia to be promotional. I deleted everything which was only sourced to the organization's own publications. I encourage anyone else to build this article with third-party sources.  Blue Rasberry  (talk)  20:11, 7 November 2014 (UTC)

UDP and sock involvement
I have added an undisclosed paid tag to this article. It has been extensively targeted by the Yoodaba UPE sockfarm, using both named accounts and, more recently, IP editors on residential proxies. It will need a thorough review and has significant balance issues: For example, the lead quotes what the institution itself says it does, as opposed to saying what reliable sources have to say; the rest of the article also has due weight issues and seems to consist mostly of a relatively indiscriminate list of the charity's achievements. Best, Blablubbs&#124;talk 13:16, 25 March 2021 (UTC)