Talk:Disallowance and reservation

Ummm, let's delete "without force"
Does Hogg really say the federal government's powers of disallowance and reservation are obsolete and without force? The Supreme Court of Canada seems to believe that the powers are still legally valid: Ontario Hydro v. Ontario (Labour Relations Board), [1993] 3 S.C.R. 327. --Mathew5000 20:02, 18 June 2006 (UTC)

Thank you for your suggestion! When you feel an article needs improvement, please feel free to make whatever changes you feel are needed. Wikipedia is a wiki, so anyone can edit almost any article by simply following the  link at the top. You don't even need to log in! (Although there are some reasons why you might like to…) The Wikipedia community encourages you to be bold. Don't worry too much about making honest mistakes&mdash;they're likely to be found and corrected quickly. If you're not sure how editing works, check out how to edit a page, or use the sandbox to try out your editing skills. New contributors are always welcome. CanadianCaesar Cæsar is turn’d to hear 20:31, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Since the article does cite an authoritative source for the proposition in question, I am reluctant to delete the statement and substitute an opposite viewpoint, without at least consulting the source myself. --Mathew5000 20:51, 18 June 2006 (UTC)