Talk:Disappointed (Electronic song)

Fair use rationale for Image:R6311front.jpg
Image:R6311front.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page. If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. BetacommandBot (talk) 04:03, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

Requested move 8 July 2021

 * The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 

The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Vpab15 (talk) 22:45, 21 July 2021 (UTC)

– Further disambiguation is needed since an article for the Public Image Ltd song has been created. This will also help avoid confusion with other songs of the same name—see the article's lengthy hatnote. ResPM (T&#x1F508; &#x1F3B5;C) 02:05, 8 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Disappointed → Disappointed (Electronic song)
 * Disappointed (song) → Disappointed (Public Image Ltd song)
 * Support per nomination. "Disappointed" should be a disambiguation page that would include Disappointed (Electronic song), Disappointed (Public Image Ltd song), Disappointed (Ivy song) and the Andy Partridge song The Disappointed, which might be considered for a move to The Disappointed (Andy Partridge song), as well as a "See also" link to the Disappointment (disambiguation) page. —Roman Spinner (talk • contribs) 05:26, 8 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Support per nom. Disappointed this isn't already a dab page. Ho ho.  Lugnuts  Fire Walk with Me 07:06, 8 July 2021 (UTC)
 * At the very least support 2nd since the primary topic is a song but the Electronic song may be the primary topic[|Disappointed_(Ivy_song)|Disappointed_(song)|Disappointed_(Field_Music_song)|Disappointed_(Stormzy_song)|Disappointed_(Death_Grips_song)|Disappointed_(Chl%C3%B6e_Howl_song)|Disappointed_(Public_Image_Ltd_song)|The_Disappointed].  Crouch, Swale  ( talk ) 08:20, 8 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Support both and also move The Disappointed (Andy Partridge song), and move in Disappointed (disambiguation). In ictu oculi (talk) 12:55, 8 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Neutral 1st, support 2nd. I'll also note that for those suggesting a move of The Disappointed, the proper title would be The Disappointed (XTC song), per WP:SONGDAB. 162 etc. (talk) 16:12, 8 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Support both. My bad on having not noticed the "Disappointed" page was already a song (though for some reason Disappointed (song) previously redirected to the PiL page). Beatleswhobeachboys (talk) 19:54, 8 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Support 2nd By itself that one could probably speedy, since there's no real argument there aren't other songs by that name (or that it is the primary). Neutral on the first for the moment, and definitely would oppose an unnecessary move of The Disappointed.--Yaksar (let's chat) 21:58, 8 July 2021 (UTC)
 * After a closer look, Oppose 1st. There appears to be a clear primary topic, even if we account for |Disappointed_(Ivy_song)|Disappointed_(song) views meant for other pages that go first through this one, and I don't see an argument that it isn't the primary yet besides the existence of other stuff (which obviously is not reason enough alone, otherwise we wouldn't have a primary topic ever!) The hatnote is definitely too long, but that can be resolved by creating a dab page.--Yaksar (let's chat) 22:03, 8 July 2021 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
 * Support both the second one is non-controversial. For the first, I don't think the song is the primary topic over the concept of disappointment. User:力 (power~enwiki,  π,  ν ) 00:45, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Support 1st, and (Strong) Support 2nd per others above. The second one should be moved speedily, and I'd say I generally support having a dab page at the basename of "Disappointed", even with pageviews. Between the three songs and the concept of Disappointment, I'd say there's no primary topic. Paintspot Infez (talk) 03:10, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Support 1st as well, Disappointment gets 2,043 views compared with only 726[|Disappointment] for the Electronic song and the former has more long-term significance.  Crouch, Swale  ( talk ) 08:38, 10 July 2021 (UTC)