Talk:Disco Kid/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer:  Puffin  ''Let's talk! 11:58, 7 July 2011 (UTC)

1. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct? ✅

2. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation? - Doesn't address the words to watch, possibly slightly bias.

3. It provides references to all sources of information in the section(s) dedicated to the attribution of these sources according to the guide to layout? - Not every claim is supported by a source.

4. It provides in-line citations from reliable sources for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons—science-based articles should follow the scientific citation guidelines? - Some citations, but more need to be added.

5. It contains no original research? ✅ - Possibly, but if so, not much.

6. It addresses the main aspects of the topic? ✅ - Yes.

7. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail? - Possibly too many reviews.

8. It represents viewpoints fairly and without bias, giving due weight to each? Repetition of same points. Not supported by sources and possibly racist.

9. It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute? - Some disputes in the history of the page.

10. Illustrated, if possible, by images: ✅ - Yes, but only one. Quite a short article so I'll let it go.

(a) Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content? - Dispute on image.

(b) Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions? ✅ -

The article does no cover the topic in enough detail, please expand the article so it adequately covers the topic and then re nominate it. Thank you. Pass or fail?'' - Fail unfortunately, fails too much of the criteria.