Talk:Discraft

Notability
The creator of the article believes that Discraft meets WP:CORP because it "has been the subject of multiple non-trivial published works whose source is independent of the company itself" and adduces the following four links in support.


 * http://www.wucc2006.org/?p=article&id=19
 * http://www4.upa.org/files/media/releases/040803.pdf
 * http://www.odeo.com/audio/86721/view
 * List of Discraft products sold on Amazon

I disagree, and nominate the article for AfD. - CrazyRussian talk/contribs/email 18:28, 12 May 2006 (UTC)

I've included notable references to Jim Kenner. Jim Kenner was instrumental in the development of disc sports. This could help in making his company (Discraft) more notable. You might want to include a little of Jims personal Frisbee biography. I've also added a link to article Ken Westerfield.If you like it fine, if not revert.Audra454 (talk) 13:24, 28 December 2011 (UTC)

citation doesn't include reference
It is worth noting that the differences between the discs are very minute, but most seasoned Ultimate players can tell the difference by touch alone when they pick up or catch something other than a Discraft 175-gram Ultra-Star.[4]

The website linked makes no mention of the ability to tell difference based on touch. 192.91.173.36 (talk) 17:52, 24 September 2013 (UTC)

Assessment comment
Substituted at 13:30, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

Advert
This whole article reads like an advert for the company to me. I'm far from an expert on the subject, and I'm still a relatively new editor, so I wouldn't feel comfortable cleaning it up myself. JaAlDo (talk) 19:35, 28 February 2020 (UTC)