Talk:Disputation of Barcelona

Reference to English Translation
http://medspains.stanford.edu/demo/barcelona/disputation.html

Is not a verifiable source. It has no Stanford insignia, it does not represent the Hebrew text and it serves to confuse, users would be better off relying on the actual text... Dannyza1981 (talk) 23:20, 15 April 2008 (UTC)

I think the sentence "Relying upon the reserve his adversary would be forced to maintain through fear of wounding the feelings of the Christian dignitaries, ..." should have a source. If there is something written that explains a person's motivations or thoughts, this must be quoted. Otherwise, it is not an objective statement. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.203.22.88 (talk) 15:15, 18 November 2013 (UTC)

Bias
This article is a bit biased in favour of Judaism. We see multiple arguments from Nahmanides (along with refutations) yet we only get a paraphrase of the Christian side of the debate. This article leans too heavily on Jewish sources, and could possibly do with some additional neutral sources. Solntsa90 (talk) 01:04, 16 September 2015 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Disputation of Barcelona. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060907082559/http://medspains.stanford.edu/demo/barcelona/disputation.html to http://medspains.stanford.edu/demo/barcelona/disputation.html
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060907082559/http://medspains.stanford.edu/demo/barcelona/disputation.html to http://medspains.stanford.edu/demo/barcelona/disputation.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 11:05, 11 September 2017 (UTC)