Talk:Disruptive innovation/Archives/2015

Cutting more items
Here's a few more I'm cutting. These are a little more borderline, so I'm saving the original text. If you disagree, find a source and drop it back in. CharlesGillingham (talk) 20:20, 16 September 2010 (UTC)

Tags on article
Hi folks, nice work on this article but it has some significant flaws and I've tagged it for these reasons: Thanks for all your good work! Best, -- — Keithbob • Talk  • 13:41, 29 June 2015 (UTC)
 * 1) It gives undue weight to Christiansen and cites his writings far too often
 * 2) The lead is too detailed and meandering it needs to be cut in half and say only what the topic is, not what the topic is not
 * 3) There is a lot of text that is unsourced. It my need to be removed if it is not sourced within a reasonable about of time.


 * Christensen identified the phenomenon, coined the term and defined it. This this is an article about his ideas.


 * I agree the lede is too long, however it does have to make clear "what it is not"; the term is so often misused, so getting the definition right is important. CharlesGillingham (talk) 00:45, 5 July 2015 (UTC)

Cut Electric cars out, the whole 'Disruptive technology' section seems outdated
In 2009 electric cars were maybe considered by some to be a disruptive technology/innovation. Fast forward to the end of 2015 and they are anything but. We are still waiting for the actual disruption: new battery technology, new business model, anything. The whole section reads antiquated, like a remnant of a time past when e-cars seemed to be a sure thing. I would do it myself but I don't even have an english wikipedia account... 217.254.59.197 (talk) 15:41, 10 October 2015 (UTC)