Talk:Diss

Requested move 6 February 2021

 * The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 

The result of the move request was: Consensus to move  (t &#183; c)  buidhe  01:26, 15 February 2021 (UTC)

– No clear primary topic over Diss (music) which has 3,770 views compared to the town's 3,867[].  Crouch, Swale  ( talk ) 20:23, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Diss (disambiguation) → Diss
 * Diss → Diss, Norfolk


 * Support per nom. No clear 100% primary topic. Move disambiguation page to basename. Paintspot Infez (talk) 20:47, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Support per nomination and Paintspot Infez. WP:NOPRIMARY. —Roman Spinner (talk • contribs) 20:57, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Support per nom.--Ortizesp (talk) 22:27, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Support. I agree there is no primary topic here. Rreagan007 (talk) 03:08, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Support. Clear absence of a primary topic. BD2412  T 06:04, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Oppose. The Norfolk town is a primary topic by long-term significance (having existed for hundreds of years), rather than a neologism (first used in 1987 but even then not in a music context). It would be better to use natural disambiguation and move Diss (music) to Diss track or Diss song. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 11:21, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
 * This is curious, a Google Books search shows me the town for the first few entries, but then the bulk of the rest is reference to a contraction of the word "dissertation". Probably safe to disambiguate fully, and reassess later. --Joy &#91;shallot&#93; (talk) 14:21, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Oppose. The town is the clear primary topic here. Remember long-term significance is a factor. -- Necrothesp (talk) 13:18, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Support. Without something more, a town winning the long term significance argument by default by virtue of existing is not enough to justify a primary topic over something that is multiple orders of magnitude more prevalent in everyday usage. The high number of other entries at the DAB page, and the low number of views (<50%) that the town gets even at the basename, supports the move. Patar knight - chat/contributions 15:22, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Support per nom ☎️  Churot  DancePop 06:38, 12 February 2021 (UTC)

"Churches in diss" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Churches in diss. The discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 February 15 until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. (t &#183; c)  buidhe  01:35, 15 February 2021 (UTC)