Talk:Dissolve (2019 film)

Requested move 27 May 2020

 * The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 

The result of the move request was: move to Dissolve (2019 film). Also, it is not clear if there is consensus for retargeting Dissolve (film) to Dissolve, so its target will not be changed; a determination of the target for Dissolve (film) can be made via WP:RFD if need be. For now, I have put a hatnote on Dissolve (filmmaking) regarding why Dissolve (film) redirects there. (non-admin closure)  Steel1943  (talk) 14:52, 13 July 2020 (UTC)

3000 (film) → Dissolve (film) – the official title is Dissolve. "3000" was a temporary title at a limited screening. 2804:14C:B8:8325:88A8:703A:2195:9619 (talk) 00:51, 27 May 2020 (UTC) —Relisting. Mdaniels5757 (talk) 18:18, 6 June 2020 (UTC)


 * Support per nom.--Ortizesp (talk) 13:26, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Not so fast – Dissolve (film) is a redirect to Dissolve (filmmaking), a style of ending a scene or transitioning between scenes in film. This seems like a perfectly valid redirect. I realize that the specific South Korean film is no longer titled 3000. But based on the existing valid redirect, it can't just be moved to "Dissolve (film)" either. I don't have an answer here, but I definitely lean oppose on the current proposal. We need a better solution here – so I want to wait to see what others have to say... --IJBall (contribs • talk) 01:28, 28 May 2020 (UTC)
 * move it to Dissolve (film) and add a note at the top for people interested in Dissolve (filmmaking). -- 2804:14C:B8:8325:98E9:98EE:AB0A:4BFC (talk) 14:54, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
 * A hatnote is one possible solution, but I want to see if that's the consensus of others... In my case, I'm not convinced that's the best solution. We'll see... --IJBall (contribs • talk) 14:56, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Seeing as no one is coming forward with any alternatives, I'm going to suggest moving to Dissolve (2019 film) as at least an interim solution, and suggest Dissolve (film) be redirected to Dissolve as per WP:INCDAB. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 15:46, 5 June 2020 (UTC)


 * Relister's comment How do we feel about IJBall's suggestion? --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 18:18, 6 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Support per nom. As to IJball's concern, a hat note works fine in this instance.  Calidum   17:50, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Oppose move as proposed. This is a stubby article based on primary sources, and even some at least of these refer to it as 3000, of a film of doubtful notability. There is no way it should displace the redirect at . Maybe move to Dissolve (2019 film) if we must move it, depending on finding recent secondary sources. Or maybe even merge to Kim Ki-duk. Andrewa (talk) 21:13, 24 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Move to Dissolve (2019 film). This doesn't seem notable enough to be preferred over the WP:PRIMARYREDIRECT to Dissolve (filmmaking). —BarrelProof (talk) 15:09, 9 July 2020 (UTC)


 * The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.