Talk:Distributed Language Translation

What happened to it? Did it work? --Taejo 20:43, 4 August 2005 (UTC)


 * Exactly my question, too! I heard of it, but then silence. Said: Rursus (☻) 07:40, 22 October 2008 (UTC)

It didn't work because it wasn't finished. They didn't include the Esperanto community to grow the amount of bilingual corpus. They gave way to Statistical Machine Translation Models. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Studyroom (talk • contribs) 14:58, 7 September 2015 (UTC)

Erroneous concept, really?
This article:
 * «From a modern view, the DLT concept was erroneous in itself, as it couldn't distinguish the different meanings of the same word in different contexts.»

The same in eowiki:
 * «[…] the worth of this research project, which according to independent experts was very promising, remains in the form of published articles and a whole series of books, detailed and comprehensive enough to sustain future further evolution […]» (translation and emphasis mine).

Furthermore, the paragraph in enwiki is erroneous, since in case of ambiguity detected during the input phase, the program would ask questions in order to get the correct meaning in the intermediate-language text.

Tonymec (talk) 07:43, 14 October 2015 (UTC)