Talk:Division of labour/Archives/2017

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Division of labour. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120612015921/http://mises.org/page/1430 to https://mises.org/page/1430

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 15:48, 11 September 2017 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 3 one external links on Division of labour. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20151231234547/http://www.heartfield.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/economy.pdf to http://www.heartfield.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/economy.pdf
 * Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20140327013847/http://mises.org/humanaction/chap8sec4.asp to https://mises.org/humanaction/chap8sec4.asp
 * Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20120509090509/http://www.centre-cournot.org/index.php/2009/11/12/conference2009/ to http://www.centre-cournot.org/index.php/2009/11/12/conference2009/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Cheers.—cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 08:57, 27 February 2016 (UTC)

Merger proposal

 * Pirehelokan (talk) proposed merger of division of work into division of labour which is reasonable, because "division of work" page has no new content, and all content are unsourced. No objection is presented since then. Chhandama (talk) 11:08, 22 October 2017 (UTC)

Why is Babbage in Smith?
This sentence is in the Adam Smith section: "Babbage wrote a seminal work "On the Economy of Machinery and Manufactures" analyzing perhaps for the first time the division of labour in factories."

It pretty obviously has nothing to do with Adam Smith! Either Babbage should have his own section, or there should be a catch-all for "others." GeneCallahan (talk) 04:34, 31 December 2017 (UTC)