Talk:Dixon Reservoir

Goals for this Article
These are some goals for this article to get it to GA status.

Additional Sections/Subsections
The main problem with this article is the lack of sections. I had to add 3 subsections and 2 sections since there were none other than the references section. We need at least 10 subsections in total and at least 5 main sections to make the article look a bit cleaner.

Citing Sources and Links
Additionally, we need to cite more sources to further back-up the claims, kind of like evidence at a jury trial. If we don't further support our text, we will be left with a reminder or two on the top of the page. We need at least 1 or 2 references per 2 sentences, or 4-7 references per paragraph.

Detailing and Adding Text
Of course, we can't cite sources without more data to back it up, which s our good friend text. We just need more details to go into the article and a further explanation into what the Dixon Reservoir is.

Once we achieve all three of these, I'm clear to say that this will be a GA.

and since this is technically your article, I'm pinging you so you can read this. I'm positive if we cooperate together on this, it's for sure going to be a GA.

Best of luck, Go-Tsumaroki   15:30, 25 September 2020 (UTC):


 * I've done 2 GA's before and let me say they were hard, so I really don't think this will get GA. But we could get it to B class or something better then a stub. But your going to have to find a lot more good refs. Best Signed, The4lines &#124;&#124;&#124;&#124; (You Asked?) (What I have Done.) 16:00, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Agreed, but it may take a long time due to the overwhelming lack of sources. Chinese_Symbol.webp Go-Tsumaroki  Japanese_Symbol.webp  16:59, 25 September 2020 (UTC)