Talk:Djibouti women's national football team/GA2

GA Reassessment
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the reassessment.''

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria


 * 1) Is it reasonably well written?
 * A. Prose quality (prose is clear and concise, without exceeding quotations, or spelling and grammar errors):
 * B. MoS compliance (including, but not limited to: lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists):
 * 1) Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
 * A. References to sources (including an appropriate reference section):
 * B. Citation of available and reliable sources where necessary (including direct quotations):
 * C. No original research:
 * D. No copyright violations:
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. Major aspects:
 * B. Focused:
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * edit wars, multiple edits not related to the GAR process, etc. (this excludes blatant vandalism):
 * 1) Does it contain images (or other media) to illustrate (or support) the topic?
 * A. Images (and other media) are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * B. Images (and other media) are provided where possible and are relevant, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * edit wars, multiple edits not related to the GAR process, etc. (this excludes blatant vandalism):
 * 1) Does it contain images (or other media) to illustrate (or support) the topic?
 * A. Images (and other media) are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * B. Images (and other media) are provided where possible and are relevant, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * B. Images (and other media) are provided where possible and are relevant, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * Pass or Fail:

This is an example of how articles age extremely badly when the main editor leaves the project. The article is stucked in 2012 (and partially in 2019). It's incomplete; in comparison the male division is more thorough than this one currently is. I'm not immediately delisting it as has been modifying some things, so maybe FOOTY can make a miracle. (CC) Tb hotch ™ 17:49, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Delist - Almost two weeks later and things are still very messy. The lead is extremely insufficient, there are mostly empty sections throughout, there's a bare URL in the references, the performance section is stuck in 2012, and the recent matches states that it is matches from the last 12 months, but includes stuff from 2019 yet.  TBH, a rework and fresh GAN may be the best way to handle this. Hog Farm Talk 17:23, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Delist - over a month later and still multiple serious issues including blank sections, the article being out of date, insufficient lead; issues are more than just a quick fix. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:41, 20 June 2021 (UTC)