Talk:Doc Frankenstein

Not promotional
I disagree with the "news release" evaluation. As far as I can tell, the lede is a history of the publication, plus a couple of relevant statements from the creators; the plot summary is NPOV and free from puffery; and the Awards section is perfectly normal.

The only problem I see is that, as noted, it needs a couple more citations in the lede, and certainly should have them for the plot summary. If you consider the plot summary itself improper, please address that directly.

Please me to discuss. --Thnidu (talk) 22:36, 10 May 2016 (UTC)