Talk:Docklands Light Railway/GA1

GA Reassessment
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the reassessment.''

As part of the WikiProject Good Articles, we're doing Sweeps to go over all of the current GAs and see if they still meet the GA criteria. So I will be assessing the article. Pyrotec (talk) 19:20, 3 June 2009 (UTC)

Reassessment
The article is a good article, but there are a number of points that need to be addressed if this artilce is to remain a WP:GA.

They include:
 * The WP:lead is a single sentence, and is non-compliant. It may just about introduce the article but it fails to summarise the main points of the article.


 * Quite a few of the paragraphs are single-sentence paragraphs. Layout suggests that this should be minimised.


 * General description - 1st and 3rd paragraphs are unreferenced. 4th para is single-sentenced.
 * Section deleted, put into the Lead.81.111.115.63 (talk) 12:00, 25 June 2009 (UTC)


 * History - Mostly unreferenced and mostly single-sentenced.


 * Initial system - 2 & 4th paragraphs unreferenced and two-sentenced.
 * First extensions - Unreferenced and mostly single-sentenced.


 * Second stage extensions - Only the final paragraph is referenced.


 * Current system - final two paragraphs are short/bitty.


 * Stations - Unreferenced.


 * Depots - Unreferenced.
 * Resolved.81.111.115.63 (talk) 12:00, 25 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Fares and ticketing - Mostly unreferenced.


 * South Quay bombing - Unreferenced.


 * Rolling stock - Unreferenced.


 * Tower Gateway rebuilding - Unreferenced and needs updating.


 * Upgrading Entire System to 3-car trains - first part is mostly single-sentenced.


 * Upgrading Delta Junction - Unreferenced and refers to Summer 2009 events as being in the future (not almost the present).

I will put the GAR On Hold so that these can be addressed.Pyrotec (talk) 20:09, 3 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Unfortunately, no progress has been made, and it's June 12. Article delisted. Once it meets the GA criteria again, it can be renominated at WP:GAN.Pyrotec (talk) 21:02, 12 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Note: I have begin to address some of these problems following the expiration of this reassessment, I'm hoping to improve the article significantly.81.111.115.63 (talk) 12:00, 25 June 2009 (UTC)