Talk:Doctors Medical Center San Pablo Campus

Self published source
As of 26 February 2012, the article contains one reference only, and that is the Doctors Medical Center article in the San Francisco Chronicle. At the bottom of the article, a disclaimer states the following:

"This article is part of ChronicleJobs, a weekly advertising feature produced by the Marketing Department of the San Francisco Chronicle, and does not involve the editorial staff."

An advertising feature is something that gets bought by the advertiser. The staff in the marketing department will help the advertiser with putting the text together. This is thus a self-published source; it does not get the benefit of an editorial overview by the newspaper's editorial staff, as the disclaimer specifically states. I have thus reinstated the self-published source template.  Schwede 66  00:38, 26 February 2012 (UTC)


 * I'm sorry that was an honest mistake, doesn't it have to legally say "A D V E R T I S E M E N T" on there though?LuciferWildCat (talk) 21:51, 27 February 2012 (UTC)


 * I don't know my way around US law.  Schwede 66  23:36, 27 February 2012 (UTC)


 * Cool, well in any case how about the additional references?LuciferWildCat (talk) 06:40, 28 February 2012 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 one external links on Doctors Medical Center San Pablo Campus. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110629165449/http://www.doctorsmedicalcenter.org/ to http://www.doctorsmedicalcenter.org/
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110629165449/http://www.doctorsmedicalcenter.org/ to http://www.doctorsmedicalcenter.org/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 14:34, 14 December 2016 (UTC)