Talk:Document Content Architecture

Merge proposal
2019 proposal to merge the long-standing stub Revisable-Form Text to here seems very reasonable, given that it covers a subtopic. Klbrain (talk) 10:59, 13 June 2020 (UTC)


 * ✅ Since DCA and RFT are related to each other, just as PDF and .docx or .odt are similarly related, I support this Merge. Jimj wpg (talk) 01:29, 14 June 2020 (UTC)

Missing feature
The article probably should mention that DCA-RFT was kind of notorious in the late 1980's for not supporting footnotes (see my previous comment at Talk:Revisable-Form Text). Also, I'm not sure what no implementations means -- there were certainly import and export filters... AnonMoos AnonMoos (talk) 16:30, 9 October 2020 (UTC)

History section
The entire history section appears to be User:Jaydubyah43's personal reminiscences. While it is certainly interesting information, I don't think it is appropriate content for a Wikipedia article. Wikipedia articles need to be based on verifiable published sources not personal reminiscences. I am wondering if there is anything salvageable in the addition or if we should just remove the whole section? SJK (talk) 09:05, 13 October 2020 (UTC)