Talk:Doe v. Bush

Ruling
This article cannot claim that this ruling established the legality since there was no ruling. When a case is dismissed the courts offer no opinion on the merits of the case. Nomen Nescio Gnothi seauton 11:19, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Actually, the court ruled that the case has no merits. I changed "legality" to "constitutionality" so it can't be confused with international law.  Isaac Pankonin 23:43, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
 * As an aside, I don't see how you can call your edits "tweak" when you completely reverted my edits. Why not just press the undo button?  Isaac Pankonin 23:46, 23 September 2007 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 one external links on Doe v. Bush. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070911191508/http://www.mfso.org/article.php?id=334 to http://www.mfso.org/article.php?id=334
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070809115028/http://www.ca1.uscourts.gov/pdf.opinions/03-1266-01A.pdf to http://www.ca1.uscourts.gov/pdf.opinions/03-1266-01A.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 16:11, 14 December 2016 (UTC)