Talk:Dog intelligence

Dog & Intelligence in the same sentence
Sure this is a contradiction. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.129.25.28 (talk) 23:11, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Please stop this trolling already. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ramdrake (talk • contribs) 23:22, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Signed for archiving purposes only.  William Harris  &#124;talk 10:11, 6 November 2016 (UTC)

Uncited statement.
"researchers have as much difficulty agreeing on a method for testing canine intelligence as they do for human intelligence."

Not only is there no citation for this statement, but it's also rather nonsensical, as mainstream science couches the evaluation of human intelligence firmly in IQ. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 198.72.236.71 (talk) 19:31, 20 August 2014 (UTC)

Redevelopment
Taking into consideration many of the comments post here over the last 6 years, that the page had some good citations and some poor ones, that it had much uncited conjecture, and the fact that it had little structure at all, I have taken the liberty of completely redeveloping this article. I trust that it is of more use to readers now. Regards, William Harris  •   talk •   05:00, 24 June 2015 (UTC)

Structure
This article on "Dog intelligence" now has a section on "Intelligence". This seems a little odd to me. DrChrissy (talk) 11:59, 9 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Because the opening sentence needs to be reflected in the body somewhere with citation, something that now appears to have been lost due to some recent "guild editing". Regards,  William Harris  &#124;talk 10:20, 6 November 2016 (UTC)