Talk:Doha (poetry)

HINDI DOHA
GURU GOVIND DOU KHADAY KAKAY LAGU PAY BALIHARI GURU APNAY GOVIND DIYO MILAY  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.197.207.8 (talk) 08:07, 1 September 2007 (UTC)

WikiProject class rating
This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 17:52, 9 November 2007 (UTC)

Buddhist Usage
I first encountered this term in Tibetan Buddhist literature, though I'm guessing it was appropriated by Vajrayana Buddhist traditions in India from earlier forms. I'll add this to my to-do list to extend this article in that direction as well, unless others would like to make an attempt first. I would love to see the full breadth of the term included. - Owlmonkey (talk) 02:52, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Like so many other adapted practices and nomenclature, having read quite a bit of Buddhist literature myself, your assumption is most likely a safe bet. However; do not also forget to mention Kabīr, the Srī Gurū Granth Sāhib, and many other sources of दोहा. Also, I am out of my depth on the finer points here, but I wonder if a very brief comparison to another form of prominent South Asian couplet, the ghazal (غزل), would be appropriate here as well. Khirad (talk) 22:52, 9 December 2008 (UTC)

One who edits wikipedia has no life???
Please see this following section. This seems like a prank by someone.

Here is a Doha by Rahim:

जो रहीम उत्तम प्रकृति का कर सकत कुसंग | 2 121 121 111/ 2 11 111 121 ==> 13/11 चन्दन विष व्यापत नहीं लिपटे रहत भुजंग || 211 11 1211 12/ 112 111 121 ==> 13/11 Says Rahim, one who studies in TMS, has no life. One who edits wikipedia has no life. Therefore, we have no life. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aman Zaidi (talk • contribs) 05:20, 26 July 2012 (UTC)

Doha
there is no DOHA of kabirdas — Preceding unsigned comment added by 106.210.224.227 (talk) 07:04, 23 December 2012 (UTC)