Talk:Doing Difference

this is not original material... it is a summary of important contribution to the sociology of gender and the intersections theory.


 * See if you can use these for the critiques:

Collins' main issue with West and Fenstermaker's Doing Difference is their lack of an argument about racism, patriarchy, and capitalism as institutional systems of power in a discussion claimed to be about the intersectional relationships between race, class, and gender. According to Collins, many scholars have considered race, gender, and class as "analytical categories," trying to find the salience of each of these categories to be able to explain inequalities. However, these scholars have not paid enough attention to racism, patriarchy and class exploitation and have viewed these factors as merely "variations of other more fundamental processes" (p.492). Looking at race, gender and class as separate areas that can affect individuals on the micro level and thus construct their social position (on the macro level) will result in assuming a hierarchical relationship between each of the systems of oppression. Unlike West and Fenstermaker, Collins defends the existing models that explain interlocking systems of oppressions such as race, class and gender on the macro level and the intersections of race, class and gender on the micro level. According to Collins, the interlocking systems of oppression on the macro level and the intersectionality of race, gender, and class on the micro level create oppression collectively. Thus she criticizes West and Fenstermaker for promising to show such relationships, but eventually ignoring the interlocking systems of oppression and institutional power, as well as not illustrating a vivid picture of intersectionality of race, gender and class in their article. While West and Fenstermaker imply that "manipulating 'difference' comprises one effective tactic used by dominant groups to maintain control," they have given the primacy to the "problem of difference," rather than problematizing "the power relations that construct difference" (p.493). Part of Maldonado's critique of West and Fenstermaker is similar to Collins' in the sense that Maldonado regards the macro level forces important in shaping the social constructions of race, gender, and class. Maldonado also argues that social constructions can have different meanings and implications for different groups of people, and West and Fenstermaker have had a monolithic view towards these constructions and have not clarified in their arguments that "whose construction" they are referring to. Takagi has praised West and Fenstermaker's work for paying attention to the "mechanisms" that produce inequality (referring to "situated conduct," interactional accomplishments," and "contextually specific interaction" p.497) rather than using a language that could obscure the "socially produced nature of difference" (p.496). However, Takagi point out the importance of using the language of mathematic metaphors, since it is a language used by academics and scientists, and it also helps "the popular understanding of inequality" (p.497). According to Thorne, West and Fenstermaker's suggestion about accountability as the main mechanism underlying race, gender, and class, and the "normative conceptions" that create difference and reproduce other normative conceptions can explain how normative categories of race, class and gender form, but it cannot further explain the transformation of these categories, as well as "the processes of resistance, challenge, conflict, and change" (p.498). Lady Sun

Proposed Merger
Propose this page be merged with Social categories, to be created. Meclee (talk) 23:58, 17 March 2012 (UTC)
 * If it is merged to a new article, how would that be different from moving it to the new title? Do you propose to merge other material, such as the new article Doing gender, based on the work of the same writers? Is there a better merge target? How about Gender role as a target for merger of this and related article which may be created in the future? Edison (talk) 20:45, 8 May 2012 (UTC)